/ruF3Lmd4A8MHbnEBE6lxPMbsHGL.jpg
MysteryDrama

Citizen Kane

- Some called him a hero...others called him a heel.

Newspaper magnate Charles Foster Kane is taken from his mother as a boy and made the ward of a rich industrialist. As a result, every well-meaning, tyrannical or self-destructive move he makes for the rest of his life appears in some way to be a reaction to that deeply wounding event.

Release Date : 1941-04-17

Language :English

Adult : false

Status : Released

Production Company : Mercury ProductionsRKO Radio Pictures

Production Country : United States of America

Alternative Titles :

Cast

Orson Welles

Character Name : Charles Foster Kane

Original Name : Orson Welles

Gender : Male

Joseph Cotten

Character Name : Jedediah Leland

Original Name : Joseph Cotten

Gender : Male

Dorothy Comingore

Character Name : Susan Alexander Kane

Original Name : Dorothy Comingore

Gender : Female

Ray Collins

Character Name : Jim W. Gettys

Original Name : Ray Collins

Gender : Male

George Coulouris

Character Name : Walter Parks Thatcher

Original Name : George Coulouris

Gender : Male

Agnes Moorehead

Character Name : Mary Kane

Original Name : Agnes Moorehead

Gender : Female

Paul Stewart

Character Name : Raymond

Original Name : Paul Stewart

Gender : Male

Ruth Warrick

Character Name : Emily Norton Kane

Original Name : Ruth Warrick

Gender : Female

Erskine Sanford

Character Name : Herbert Carter

Original Name : Erskine Sanford

Gender : Male

William Alland

Character Name : Jerry Thompson/Narrator

Original Name : William Alland

Gender : Male

Everett Sloane

Character Name : Mr. Bernstein

Original Name : Everett Sloane

Gender : Male

Fortunio Bonanova

Character Name : Signor Matiste

Original Name : Fortunio Bonanova

Gender : Male

Gus Schilling

Character Name : John

Original Name : Gus Schilling

Gender : Male

Philip Van Zandt

Character Name : Mr. Rawlston

Original Name : Philip Van Zandt

Gender : Male

Georgia Backus

Character Name : Bertha Anderson

Original Name : Georgia Backus

Gender : Female

Harry Shannon

Character Name : Jim Kane

Original Name : Harry Shannon

Gender : Male

Sonny Bupp

Character Name : Charles Foster Kane III

Original Name : Sonny Bupp

Gender : Male

Buddy Swan

Character Name : Young Charles Foster Kane

Original Name : Buddy Swan

Gender : Male

Gregg Toland

Character Name : Interviewer

Original Name : Gregg Toland

Gender : Male

Don Ackerman

Character Name : Man at Party in Everglades (uncredited)

Original Name : Don Ackerman

Gender : Male

Gino Corrado

Character Name : Gino (uncredited)

Original Name : Gino Corrado

Gender : Male

Maurice Costello

Character Name : Extra (uncredited)

Original Name : Maurice Costello

Gender : Male

Demetrius Alexis

Character Name : Newsreel Man (uncredited)

Original Name : Demetrius Alexis

Gender : Male

Gene Coogan

Character Name : Newsreel Man (uncredited)

Original Name : Gene Coogan

Gender : Male

Art Dupuis

Character Name : Newsreel Man (uncredited)

Original Name : Art Dupuis

Gender : Male

Rudy Germane

Character Name : Newsreel Man (uncredited)

Original Name : Rudy Germane

Gender : Male

Mike Lally

Character Name : Newsreel Man (uncredited)

Original Name : Mike Lally

Gender : Male

Walter Lawrence

Character Name : Newsreel Man (uncredited)

Original Name : Walter Lawrence

Gender : Male

John Northpole

Character Name : Newsreel Man (uncredited)

Original Name : John Northpole

Gender : Male

Victor Romito

Character Name : Newsreel Man (uncredited)

Original Name : Victor Romito

Gender : Male

Bob Terry

Character Name : Newsreel Man (uncredited)

Original Name : Bob Terry

Gender : Male

William Alston

Character Name : Man at Xanadu Great Hall (uncredited)

Original Name : William Alston

Gender : Male

Jack Gargan

Character Name : Man at Xanadu Great Hall (uncredited)

Original Name : Jack Gargan

Gender : Male

Bert Moorhouse

Character Name : Man at Xanadu Great Hall (uncredited)

Original Name : Bert Moorhouse

Gender : Male

Carmen Laroux

Character Name : Maid in Xanadu Hall (uncredited)

Original Name : Carmen Laroux

Gender : Female

Sam Ash

Character Name : Man at Boat Dock (uncredited)

Original Name : Sam Ash

Gender : Male

Buddy Messinger

Character Name : Man at Boat Dock (uncredited)

Original Name : Buddy Messinger

Gender : Male

Terrance Ray

Character Name : Man at Boat Dock (uncredited)

Original Name : Terrance Ray

Gender : Male

Sally Corner

Character Name : Woman at Boat Dock (uncredited)

Original Name : Sally Corner

Gender : Female

Walter Bacon

Character Name : City Room Employee (uncredited)

Original Name : Walter Bacon

Gender : Male

Herbert Corthell

Character Name : City Editor (uncredited)

Original Name : Herbert Corthell

Gender : Male

Harry A. Bailey

Character Name : Man Singing at Inquirer Party (uncredited)

Original Name : Harry A. Bailey

Gender : Male

Danny Borzage

Character Name : Man Singing at Inquirer Party (uncredited)

Original Name : Danny Borzage

Gender : Male

J.J. Clark

Character Name : Man Singing at Inquirer Party (uncredited)

Original Name : J.J. Clark

Gender : Male

Tom Coleman

Character Name : Man Singing at Inquirer Party (uncredited)

Original Name : Tom Coleman

Gender : Male

Carl Deloro

Character Name : Man Singing at Inquirer Party (uncredited)

Original Name : Carl Deloro

Gender : Male

Jack Egan

Character Name : Man Singing at Inquirer Party (uncredited)

Original Name : Jack Egan

Gender : Male

Robert Haines

Character Name : Man Singing at Inquirer Party (uncredited)

Original Name : Robert Haines

Gender : Male

Ludwig Lowry

Character Name : Man Singing at Inquirer Party (uncredited)

Original Name : Ludwig Lowry

Gender : Male

John McCormack

Character Name : Man Singing at Inquirer Party (uncredited)

Original Name : John McCormack

Gender : Male

Hercules Mendez

Character Name : Man Singing at Inquirer Party (uncredited)

Original Name : Hercules Mendez

Gender : Male

Paddy O'Flynn

Character Name : Man Singing at Inquirer Party (uncredited)

Original Name : Paddy O'Flynn

Gender : Male

Sam Rice

Character Name : Man Singing at Inquirer Party (uncredited)

Original Name : Sam Rice

Gender : Male

Don Roberts

Character Name : Man Singing at Inquirer Party (uncredited)

Original Name : Don Roberts

Gender : Male

Larry Wheat

Character Name : Man Singing at Inquirer Party (uncredited)

Original Name : Larry Wheat

Gender : Male

Larry Williams

Character Name : Man Singing at Inquirer Party (uncredited)

Original Name : Larry Williams

Gender : Male

Joan Blair

Character Name : Georgia (uncredited)

Original Name : Joan Blair

Gender : Female

Morgan Brown

Character Name : Servant (uncredited)

Original Name : Morgan Brown

Gender : Male

Harry Burkhardt

Character Name : Wedding Guest (uncredited)

Original Name : Harry Burkhardt

Gender : Male

Edmund Cobb

Character Name : Inquirer Reporter (uncredited)

Original Name : Edmund Cobb

Gender : Male

Eddie Coke

Character Name : Reporter (uncredited)

Original Name : Eddie Coke

Gender : Male

Louis Natheaux

Character Name : Reporter (uncredited)

Original Name : Louis Natheaux

Gender : Male

Arthur O'Connell

Character Name : Reporter (uncredited)

Original Name : Arthur O'Connell

Gender : Male

Guy Repp

Character Name : Reporter (uncredited)

Original Name : Guy Repp

Gender : Male

Tom Steele

Character Name : Reporter (uncredited)

Original Name : Tom Steele

Gender : Male

Richard Wilson

Character Name : Reporter (uncredited)

Original Name : Richard Wilson

Gender : Male

Louise Currie

Character Name : Reporter at Xanadu (uncredited)

Original Name : Louise Currie

Gender : Female

Walter Sande

Character Name : Reporter at Xanadu (uncredited)

Original Name : Walter Sande

Gender : Male

Jan Wiley

Character Name : Reporter at Xanadu (uncredited)

Original Name : Jan Wiley

Gender : Female

Milton Kibbee

Character Name : Reporter at Wedding (uncredited)

Original Name : Milton Kibbee

Gender : Male

Buck Mack

Character Name : Reporter at Boat Deck (uncredited)

Original Name : Buck Mack

Gender : Male

Alan Ladd

Character Name : Reporter Smoking Pipe at End (uncredited)

Original Name : Alan Ladd

Gender : Male

Thomas A. Curran

Character Name : Teddy Roosevelt (uncredited)

Original Name : Thomas A. Curran

Gender : Male

Jack Curtis

Character Name : Boss Printer (uncredited)

Original Name : Jack Curtis

Gender : Male

George Noisom

Character Name : Copy Boy (uncredited)

Original Name : George Noisom

Gender : Male

Gerald Pierce

Character Name : Copy Boy Delivering Message in Chicago Hotel Room (uncredited)

Original Name : Gerald Pierce

Gender : Male

Dona Dax

Character Name : House Maid (uncredited)

Original Name : Dona Dax

Gender : Female

George DeNormand

Character Name : Newspaperman at Trenton Town Hall (uncredited)

Original Name : George DeNormand

Gender : Male

Bud Geary

Character Name : Newspaperman at Trenton Town Hall (uncredited)

Original Name : Bud Geary

Gender : Male

Bert LeBaron

Character Name : Newspaperman at Trenton Town Hall (uncredited)

Original Name : Bert LeBaron

Gender : Male

Clyde McAtee

Character Name : Newspaperman at Trenton Town Hall (uncredited)

Original Name : Clyde McAtee

Gender : Male

Cyril Ring

Character Name : Newspaperman at Trenton Town Hall (uncredited)

Original Name : Cyril Ring

Gender : Male

Roland Winters

Character Name : Newspaperman at Trenton Town Hall (uncredited)

Original Name : Roland Winters

Gender : Male

Lew Harvey

Character Name : Newspaperman (uncredited)

Original Name : Lew Harvey

Gender : Male

Herman J. Mankiewicz

Character Name : Newspaperman (uncredited)

Original Name : Herman J. Mankiewicz

Gender : Male

Eddie Dew

Character Name : Man in Projection Room (uncredited)

Original Name : Eddie Dew

Gender : Male

Perc Launders

Character Name : Man in Projection Room (uncredited)

Original Name : Perc Launders

Gender : Male

John Dilson

Character Name : Ward Heeler (uncredited)

Original Name : John Dilson

Gender : Male

Walter James

Character Name : Ward Heeler (uncredited)

Original Name : Walter James

Gender : Male

Robert Dudley

Character Name : Photographer (uncredited)

Original Name : Robert Dudley

Gender : Male

Suzanne Dulier

Character Name : French Maid (uncredited)

Original Name : Suzanne Dulier

Gender : Male

Al Eben

Character Name : Solly (uncredited)

Original Name : Al Eben

Gender : Male

Johnny Eckert

Character Name : Car-Driver (uncredited)

Original Name : Johnny Eckert

Gender : Male

Carl Ekberg

Character Name : Adolf Hitler (uncredited)

Original Name : Carl Ekberg

Gender : Male

Edith Evanson

Character Name : Leland's Nurse (uncredited)

Original Name : Edith Evanson

Gender : Female

Carl Faulkner

Character Name : Hermann Goring (uncredited)

Original Name : Carl Faulkner

Gender : Male

Juanita Fields

Character Name : Dancer (uncredited)

Original Name : Juanita Fields

Gender : Male

Edna Mae Jones

Character Name : Dancer (uncredited)

Original Name : Edna Mae Jones

Gender : Female

Leda Nicova

Character Name : Dancer (uncredited)

Original Name : Leda Nicova

Gender : Male

Jolane Reynolds

Character Name : Dancer (uncredited)

Original Name : Jolane Reynolds

Gender : Female

Suzanne Ridgway

Character Name : Dancer (uncredited)

Original Name : Suzanne Ridgway

Gender : Female

Olin Francis

Character Name : Expressman (uncredited)

Original Name : Olin Francis

Gender : Male

Louise Franklin

Character Name : Susan's Maid (uncredited)

Original Name : Louise Franklin

Gender : Male

Renee Godfrey

Character Name : Nurse (uncredited)

Original Name : Renee Godfrey

Gender : Female

Peter Gowland

Character Name : Guest (uncredited)

Original Name : Peter Gowland

Gender : Male

Jimmy Grant

Character Name : Man at Party in Everglades (uncredited)

Original Name : Jimmy Grant

Gender : Male

Jesse Graves

Character Name : Joseph (uncredited)

Original Name : Jesse Graves

Gender : Male

Ernest Grooney

Character Name : Man on Hospital Roof (uncredited)

Original Name : Ernest Grooney

Gender : Male

Jack Gwynne

Character Name : Man on Hospital Roof (uncredited)

Original Name : Jack Gwynne

Gender : Male

Teddy Mangean

Character Name : Man on Roof (uncredited)

Original Name : Teddy Mangean

Gender : Male

Henry Hebert

Character Name : Best Man at Wedding (uncredited)

Original Name : Henry Hebert

Gender : Male

Bryan 'Slim' Hightower

Character Name : Fish Driver (uncredited)

Original Name : Bryan 'Slim' Hightower

Gender : Male

Mitchell Ingraham

Character Name : Politician (uncredited)

Original Name : Mitchell Ingraham

Gender : Male

Philip Morris

Character Name : Politician (uncredited)

Original Name : Philip Morris

Gender : Male

Francis Sayles

Character Name : Politician (uncredited)

Original Name : Francis Sayles

Gender : Male

George W. Jimenez

Character Name : Waiter at Inquirer Party (uncredited)

Original Name : George W. Jimenez

Gender : Male

Ellen Lowe

Character Name : Ms. Townsend (uncredited)

Original Name : Ellen Lowe

Gender : Female

James T. Mack

Character Name : Prompter (uncredited)

Original Name : James T. Mack

Gender : Male

Mickey Martin

Character Name : Newsboy (uncredited)

Original Name : Mickey Martin

Gender : Male

Bruce Sidney

Character Name : Newsman (uncredited)

Original Name : Bruce Sidney

Gender : Male

Major McBride

Character Name : Shadowgraph Man (uncredited)

Original Name : Major McBride

Gender : Male

Frank McLure

Character Name : (uncredited)

Original Name : Frank McLure

Gender : Male

Charles Meakin

Character Name : Civic Leader (uncredited)

Original Name : Charles Meakin

Gender : Male

Edward Peil Jr.

Character Name : Civic Leader (uncredited)

Original Name : Edward Peil Jr.

Gender : Male

Irving Mitchell

Character Name : Dr. Corey (uncredited)

Original Name : Irving Mitchell

Gender : Male

Frances E. Neal

Character Name : Ethel (uncredited)

Original Name : Frances E. Neal

Gender : Female

Lillian Nicholson

Character Name : Woman at Opera (uncredited)

Original Name : Lillian Nicholson

Gender : Male

Joseph North

Character Name : Secretary (uncredited)

Original Name : Joseph North

Gender : Male

William H. O'Brien

Character Name : Secretary (uncredited)

Original Name : William H. O'Brien

Gender : Male

Field Norton

Character Name : Opera Spectator (uncredited)

Original Name : Field Norton

Gender : Male

Dick Scott

Character Name : Opera Spectator (uncredited)

Original Name : Dick Scott

Gender : Male

Frank O'Connor

Character Name : Man at Madison Square Garden (uncredited)

Original Name : Frank O'Connor

Gender : Male

Russ Powell

Character Name : Man at Madison Square Garden (uncredited)

Original Name : Russ Powell

Gender : Male

Bert Stevens

Character Name : Man at Madison Square Garden (uncredited)

Original Name : Bert Stevens

Gender : Male

Thomas Pogue

Character Name : Man (uncredited)

Original Name : Thomas Pogue

Gender : Male

Lillian O'Malley

Character Name : Woman in Front of Chronicle Building (uncredited)

Original Name : Lillian O'Malley

Gender : Female

Jack Raymond

Character Name : Stagehand (uncredited)

Original Name : Jack Raymond

Gender : Male

Gohr Van Vleck

Character Name : Stagehand (uncredited)

Original Name : Gohr Van Vleck

Gender : Male

Myrtle Rishell

Character Name : Big Governess (uncredited)

Original Name : Myrtle Rishell

Gender : Female

Benny Rubin

Character Name : Smather (uncredited)

Original Name : Benny Rubin

Gender : Male

Shimen Ruskin

Character Name : Hireling (uncredited)

Original Name : Shimen Ruskin

Gender : Male

George Sherwood

Character Name : Hireling (uncredited)

Original Name : George Sherwood

Gender : Male

Edward Ryan

Character Name : Man in Inquirer City Room (uncredited)

Original Name : Edward Ryan

Gender : Male

Landers Stevens

Character Name : Senate Investigator (uncredited)

Original Name : Landers Stevens

Gender : Male

Harry J. Vejar

Character Name : Portuguese Laborer (uncredited)

Original Name : Harry J. Vejar

Gender : Male

Tudor Williams

Character Name : Chorus Master (uncredited)

Original Name : Tudor Williams

Gender : Male

Arthur Yeoman

Character Name : Speaker (uncredited)

Original Name : Arthur Yeoman

Gender : Male

Tim Davis

Character Name : Copy Boy (uncredited)

Original Name : Tim Davis

Gender : Male

Charles Bennett

Character Name : Entertainer (uncredited)

Original Name : Charles Bennett

Gender : Male

Arthur Kay

Character Name : Orchestra Leader (Uncredited)

Original Name : Arthur Kay

Gender : Male

John Alban

Character Name : Reporter (uncredited)

Original Name : John Alban

Gender : Male

Finn Zirzow

Character Name : Audience Member (uncredited)

Original Name : Finn Zirzow

Gender : Male

Sam Harris

Character Name : Newsreel Man (uncredited)

Original Name : Sam Harris

Gender : Male

Dorothy Cleveland

Character Name : Woman in Front of Chronicle Building (uncredited)

Original Name : Dorothy Cleveland

Gender : Female

Reviews

G

Gurre

@Gurre

2021-06-23

"The Greatest Movie of All Time!" That's the general opinion of this movie, and I agree that it is a great movie, but I have seen better movies. The story of Citizen Kane is simple, a newspaper tycoon named Charles Foster Kane (Orson Welles) dies, and his last word is "Rosebud". No one knows what it means, and a reporter starts interviewing people Kane knew, to see if they know the meaning of "Rosebud". Through flash-backs we get to see Kane's life. Now, as I said, I don't agree that it's the greatest movie of all time, however it's great. I love this movie. It's a daring and controversial movie of its time, and it introduced alot of new technices in filmmaking. The acting is superb! Orson Welles as Kane is breathtaking, Joseph Cotten as Jed Leland is great. There's one performance I can hardly stand though and that's Dorothy Comingore's performance as Susan Alexander. Hideous performance to say the least! The writing is amazing, and Welles' directing is out-of-this-world! In conclusion, great movie (however not the greatest ever made). It's definitly a movie you need to watch! I give it a 9/10

T

talisencrw

@talisencrw

2021-06-23

I fondly recollect, growing up in Canada in the 70's and 80's, my mom taking my older sister and I to the cinema (my dad was more interested in watching bowling, hockey, or either crime shows, British sitcoms or hockey on TV). Despite all of his TV appearances over the years, and films he acted in to fund his own productions, the first time I was aware of Orson Welles was one of those startling and bizarrely professional yet unmistakably charismatic 'Paul Masson' wine commercials that they tend to make fun of on The Simpsons in these decades gone by. My first thought was 'that voice is amazing', then 'he looks like he'd be a fine grandfather or Santa Claus', and I instantly wanted to know who he was: Just the way he carried himself, I knew he must be both brilliant and someone who was really important. As you can tell, I'm not going to unnecessarily repeat all the endless accolades this film has gotten over the years. If you're any type of film lover, you have either seen this or will eventually--unless you're hit by a bus tomorrow (Heaven forbid) or something else drastic. It's a hallmark of what is possible in cinema. I waited until I was 46 to see this, because of its stellar reputation. It's not my favourite Welles--either acting or directing, and not by a long shot in either regard--but I'm very glad that I finally saw it, and I'll probably revisit it every couple of years for the rest of my life. There's just something really special about it that's hardly ever seen any more--and I think of that just as wistfully as Charles Foster Kane did about his beloved 'Rosebud'. That a 25-year-old could be so gleefully and breathtakingly experimental and innovative, yet still endlessly entertain, is nothing short of miraculous.

M

Manuel São Bento

@msbreviews

2021-06-23

If you enjoy reading my Spoiler-Free reviews, please follow my blog @ https://www.msbreviews.com The "greatest film of all-time", everyone declares. I've been revisiting David Fincher's career this last week since he's in charge of directing the upcoming Mank, which premise approaches the story behind Citizen Kane's screenplay credit controversy back in 1941. Herman J. Mankiewicz unquestionably helped Orson Welles writing the script for this movie, but if that contribution was enough to warrant his name on the film's credits, well... Apparently, it was settled that Mankiewicz (known as Mank) did indeed deserve that recognition since I just had to write his name on the "written by" section above. Nevertheless, this review doesn't concern that external issue, but yes, the most globally acclaimed movie in cinema's history. I always defend that someone's opinion about a film is as valid as everyone else's. Unless the arguments used are disrespectful, reductive comments such as the cliche "it's just boring" or the externally influenced "I don't like that actor in real life, hence the movie is awful", I'm always ready to discuss a film with anyone who shows respect for the respective flick. There's an interesting question people keep asking me: "should I watch this old movie that everyone talks about? It's just that..." and usually they linger around here. Probably, afraid of saying something like "it's still in black-and-white" or "its visuals are so old-fashioned". This is a pretty common behavior in the entertainment realm that is film watching. I always reply back with another question: "if you love movies, why wouldn't you want to watch such a highly acclaimed film, no matter how old it is?" And, again, people hesitate because they've never asked themselves this. They're afraid that their "discrimination" against old movies might affect their overall opinion about them, and then be in that complicated position that is being in a very small minority. If there's something time didn't change is that people still don't know how to behave when they're part of a little group with an unpopular opinion. Some follow the offense route, attacking anyone who disagrees with them. Others create conspiracy theories, saying that most people think otherwise because they followed the herd, not possessing a genuine, personal opinion. If you love the art of filmmaking, if you enjoy going to the film theater, then watching older movies will only improve upon that passion. However, there's a certain responsibility that the viewer should always have. As a spectator, we must always be able to place ourselves in the adequate period. We can't watch a 1941's film with the cultural, technological, social rules, and mentality of 2020. It would be extremely unfair to these movies since our enjoyment will be affected by modern political views, religious perspectives, and historical differences. We will look at a film like Citizen Kane, and deceivingly think: "I don't see anything remotely new or innovative in any shape or form". This leads me to a suggestion I always give every movie lover like me. It doesn't matter too much if you do this before or after the actual viewing of an "old film", but do a quick research on its impact on filmmaking and our culture. Understand why or what makes the movie so special. Learn what to look out for when watching the film, and adjust your knowledge of everything to the year of release. Try imagining yourself as a person living in that year, leaving home to go to the closest movie theater, and sitting in your favorite spot to watch a new motion picture. If you're able to do all of this, then there's absolutely no way of not acknowledging the unprecedented, groundbreaking, historically impactful Citizen Kane. Still to this day, film critics get that childish, ignorant judgment of "critics don't know how to have fun, they only value artsy stuff that no one cares about". I'm not going to enter a debate about this, otherwise, I'd have to write an essay, but I will address that last part. The "artsy stuff" is what movies are made of. Without the artists behind each technical component, we wouldn't evolve to the point of getting the visually mind-blowing films we receive every month. Well, Citizen Kane impacted every single piece of cinema and shaped the filmmaking industry. People complain about directors not being able to share their original vision in 2020? Try making a movie 80 years ago, where studios were always responsible for the final cut. Orson Welles changed that process, and much, much more. From the original marketing campaign (it was the first time a trailer didn't contain a single shot from the actual film) to the inventive storytelling structure, there's no denying that the groundbreaking technical aspects transformed filmmaking forever. At the time, ceilings weren't shown, hand-held cameras were unheard of, the lighting had strict rules, and unconventional angles weren't used. Gregg Toland's cinematography changed all of that and tremendously influenced how movies are made today. His experimental methods gave rise to the imaginative use of "deep focus", where the camera shows the foreground, background, and everything in between, all in sharp focus. Toland was so crucial for the success of Citizen Kane that Welles decided to share the credits spotlight with him. Vernon L. Walker, as the VFX supervisor, employed techniques so impressive that just a few months ago, we had the famous Corridor Crew VFX team breakdown a particular sequence, and most of them didn't know how Walker did it. The latter was a pioneer in shooting massive crowds and wide interior places. Robert Wise's editing is the main component in the famous breakfast montage, by creating a sequence in the exact same location while the actors change their clothes and make-up between cuts, giving the feel of time passing by even though the set design is still the same In every other technical component, innovation is the keyword. Bailey Fesler and James G. Stewart employed rarely used radio techniques to simulate crowd noise and singing. Bernard Herrmann composed an unconventional score due to its pauses and short bits of soundtrack, something utterly different from the typical non-stop music of Hollywood films. Finally, Mankiewicz and Welles' screenplay. Its structure based on flashbacks and a nonlinear timeline was unique at the time. It's probably why the movie doesn't feel as old as other films when watching it today. Citizen Kane is decades ahead of its time, technically and story-wise. And its ending... still as powerful and jaw-dropping as in the first time I saw it. It became the most influential movie in the history of cinema. It's constantly at the top of many "best films of all-time" lists, and it's still the number one movie for several critics. Orson Welles' film is probably the movie with the most amount of hype one ever got, to the point of making people afraid of even saying that "it's fine", let alone dislike it. If you think Citizen Kane is a bit boring or that the actors aren't that good or even if you weren't surprised by anything... you're far from being alone. People talk about this film like it's a once-in-a-lifetime experience, a movie that will take people to Mars or to another galaxy. It's understandable if many viewers simply don't find any of the phenomenal qualities that everyone talks about. The fact that most of the film is astonishingly innovative doesn't take away the other fact that it's still a movie from 1941. If it was released today (with all the natural modifications), most people would find it a very well-directed film, technically exceptional, and possessing a quite remarkable character-study. It doesn't mean it has to resonate with everyone. There's no movie in history loved or hated by everyone, and there will never be one. I don't ask you to learn to love Citizen Kane. I ask you to comprehend its legacy, background, and undeniable impact on filmmaking and our culture. Almost every film we see on massive IMAXs today, we owe that to Orson Welles and his visionary production. 80 years after its release, Citizen Kane continues to be addressed by many as "the greatest movie ever made". It became the most popular film of all-time, one that went through decades of in-depth essays. Everything that needed to be said about it has already been stated, recorded, and written. No movie warrants higher expectations from its viewers, but this massive hype makes it a dangerous film. People fear being judged for not understanding the worldwide acclaim or simply disliking it. Is it a tad boring? Are some actors flat? Is the story not as mesmerizing and memorable as you'd expect? Don't be afraid to say "yes" because all of these opinions are entirely reasonable. None of this contradicts the indisputable influence it had on filmmaking and in the history of cinema. Everything about this movie's production and origin, the precedent-setting technical aspects, and the innovative storytelling all prove that Orson Welles was a perfectionist filmmaker far ahead of its time. Is it the best film ever? That's a never-ending debate I don't wish to be a part of. But it's undeniably one of the most magnificent masterpieces of cinema, one that every movie lover must watch. Rating: A+

R

r96sk

@r96sk

2021-06-23

Outstanding film, no question. 'Citizen Kane', at least to me, feels like such a unique film in terms of how it is brought to life - I don't recall seeing anything that exactly matches it in that regard. It's thoroughly entertaining, I do love how it is crafted together. The score is terrific and the performances from the cast are excellent. Orson Welles, the director too of course, is perfect for the titular role. He is sensational, it must be said. He makes Charles Foster Kane absolutely fascinating, despite the questionable nature of the character. I basically enjoyed everyone else who came onscreen, the more memorable ones being Joseph Cotten (Jedediah) and Dorothy Comingore (Susan) - George Coulouris (Thatcher) has a few amusing moments, also. The editing and pacing are two other things that impressed me, as did the fantastic News on the March opening. This is one of those films that I've heard about for as long as I can remember, so I'm glad to finally get it watched - added to the fact it didn't disappoint.

W

Wuchak

@Wuchak

2022-06-19

_**Not the greatest film of all time, but has its points of interest**_ After the death of an American newspaper tycoon with political aspirations (Orson Welles), his relatives and associates are interviewed with one reporter trying to figure out the meaning of his last word, “Rosebud.” "Citizen Kane" (1941) was Welles’ first feature film, which he co-wrote & directed when he was only 25 with a cast of theretofore unknowns (e.g. Joseph Cotton). It’s regarded as “the greatest movie ever made” by many respectable people and was, for instance, Roger Ebert’s favorite film. Charles Foster Kane and his magnificent homestead Xanadu were inspired by media barons like William Randolph Hearst and his never-completed Hearst Castle. The concept naturally brings to mind Elvis and Graceland, Michael Jackson and Neverland, and Donald Trump and Trump Tower (or whatever). On a filmmaking level there’s a lot to appreciate, including techniques that were fresh at the time of its release, such as unusual camera angles, lens distortion and the creative use of flashbacks. Up to that point in film history, for instance, ceilings were never shown because that’s where the mics were located, but Welles included myriad scenes from low angles with the ceiling obvious in the background. Then there are the interesting interpretations, including the two main ones, which seemingly contradict: The enigma view suggests that the nature of a person is ultimately a mystery based on numerous subjective truths of different people’s perspectives whereas the rosebud interpretation proposes that a person’s life can ultimately be figured out based on a key clue. In Kane’s case, the clue is linked to lost innocence, the comfort of childhood, a mother’s love and the lack of responsibilities thereof. As far as entertainment goes, the flick starts with vigor and features some highlights (e.g. the lively dancing sequence, Kane’s political ambitions and the hollow halls of Xanadu) and human interest (e.g. Kane’s relationship with the amateur opera singer), but I found it unengaging too often. I simply didn’t find Kane a fascinating enough character and therefore didn’t ‘get’ the obsession with interpreting his life. Still, I wouldn't call this "Citizen Suck." For greatest movies ever made I’ll go with flicks like “Apocalypse Now,” “Runaway Train,” “Raiders of the Lost Ark,” “Dead Poets Society,” “The Mothman Prophecies,” “Watchmen,” “The Green Mile,” “Star Trek IV: The Voyage Home,” “Dances with Wolves,” “The Horse Whisperer,” “Lucy,” “Troy,” “One-Eyed Jacks,” “Mutiny on the Bounty” (1962), “Tarzan and His Mate” and “One Flew Over the Cuckoo’s Nest.” The film runs 1 hour, 59 minutes, and was shot in SoCal and New York. GRADE: B-/C+

C

CinemaSerf

@Geronimo1967

2022-06-25

If ever there was a film epitomising the best and worst of the "American Dream" then this has to be the one.... Orson Welles has mastered the role of the playboy millionaire who decides to have a go at running a small provincial newspaper - ostensibly to empower the common people and give them a voice... Shortly his combination of wealth, determination and deftness has created a monster with tentacles into almost every aspect of American life; and with that, as they say about absolute power - a good dose of personal ambition and corruption. Gradually losing those around him who debate and challenge, he becomes an intellectual brute; a tyrant - and an emotionally unfulfilled one at that. Joseph Cotton is also superb as his best friend who suffers with his own internal turmoils as he watches the rise and rise of "Kane"; Everett Sloane as his long-suffering sidekick and Dorothy Comingore as his second wife "Susan" plays her role almost exactly as an immature child, in the care of a stern but equally immature guardian. It is as much a social commentary of 1940s aspirational America as it is a powerful depiction of megalomania - and although it has certainly lost some of it's bite over the last 80 years it still delivers a powerful analysis of the concentration of wealth, power, and influence that could easily be applied (to social media domination) today. As with so many Hitchcock films, Bernard Hermann delivers an enveloping score in which this all floats nicely - and technically, it wants for nothing - the eeriness and sterility of "Xanadu" contributing wonderfully to the last half hour of this enigmatic story.

T

testr

@testr

2022-07-15

ctually every bit as good as it supposed to be. To anyone who likes to think they're being edgy by calling it overrated or whatever, I know you're just saying it because you think it makes you cool and counter-cultural or whatever, so I probably can't change your mind whatever I say here, but one thing anyone should try is watching all the Academy Award nominees, or at least the Best Picture nominees, from the 14th Academy Awards, in sucession, perhaps one a day. Despite only winning one award, and famously losing out on Best Picture, this film makes all the others look embarrassingly dated. Even the ones that are also very good look like Roundhay Garden Scene compared to this. It truly is a revolution of a film. Welles could have gone exclusively into gore porn after this and he would still be a good candidate for the greatest talent in American cinema. This film has already been rightfully praised so much it's hard to find anything new to say about it, so mostly all I can do is heap on more praise to the pile, but this film deserves it. A few things are slightly less talked about from this film that I do wanna bring up though; 1. This is a lot funnier than people give it credit for. Welles himself called it a comedy, I believe, and honestly I can see that. There's some very witty dialogue. My favourite gag might be the "FRAUD AT POLLS" headline. 2. Weird how Welles' obvious self-deprecating joke about how he inserted the screeching cockatoo to wake up any audience members falling asleep has been taken out of context and treated as serious by so many people. It seems obvious to me that it was as a sort of bookend to his relationship with Susan, referring back to the shadow puppet scene where Kane makes a bird 3. The speech about the girl in the white dress is actually one of my favourite monologues in any film. The "frame story" actually has a lot of great moments that people often forget because they spend all their time praising the scenes with Kane in them (and fair enough, they are incredible). 4. Susan's bad singing is some impressive work. It's hard to sing purposefully poorly without falling into cartoonist shrieking, but actress Dorothy Comingore is very good at sound just bad enough to be believable. 6. I like how, unlike most films about "corrupt rich people", this doesn't moralise or turn its character into a Bond villain, but condemns what he represents far more strongly than if it did, because systemic critiques always hit harder than "rich people are mean :(", which is one of the most helpful to the status quo statements you can make, implying as it does that it would be fine if the ruling class could throw us a bone with a few more scraps of meat on it. 7. The opening and final shots might be the best one-two punch of those two things in... certainly a major release American film, if not any film ever. We begin with death, and end with youth. All sounds pretty simple when you say it out loud like this but as I say it's already been analysed in so much depth all I can say is either redundant or just feels like explaining why a funny joke is funny. 8. It's hard to review this without sounding silly. "Masterpiece" is hilariously understating it. Like, of course Citizen Kane is good. What do you want me to say?

J

JJJ222cool

@JJJ222cool

2023-06-28

I watched it because it keeps getting mentioned as one of the best films ever made. I was disappointed. For me it is just average, the hype is unjustified in my opinion. There are much better films from that time and later on.

B

badelf

@badelf

2023-07-26

Now I know why I'm stingy with 10/10 ratings. This .. Is the film.by which all others should be judged. It has it all. From the captivating storyline to the exceptional performances, this film truly sets the bar high for cinematic excellence. Its seamless blend of creative framing, music, and narrative pacing tells a story that can never be dated because it's universal and creates an unforgettable movie-watching experience. It resonates on multiple levels. I knew Orsen Welles was great, but this film displays his genius. Welles and Mankiewicz have truly created a masterpiece. Few of us escape our childhood slights and insults, but childhood trauma can create a lifetime prison. It is a complicated psychology that can resist the strongest attempts at fixing it. Few can even begin to explain the lifetime impact, let alone create a film that exposes this very subject. It's a monument to Welles artistry and craftsmanship.

J

James

@JN2012

2023-10-20

This is great but if it is actually the greatest of all time then I’ll eat my socks.